Note that when the amplitude x of the
oscillations
goes to zero, the frequency F(x) becomes infinite. However the energy
E(x) also
goes to zero so these infinite frequencies are non-physical. Now that
we know the relationship between amplitude and frequency how shall we
choose an appropriate frequency of oscillation for the isolated upright
penny?
The
Equipartition Theorem states that each degree of freedom contains an
average of one kT of energy. If we then set E(x) = kT we can solve for
the tilt amplitude x
T which corresponds to an
oscillation that contains exactly one kT of energy. Then F (x
T)
will be the room-temperature frequency of oscillation of this "hot
copper oscillator".
We will use this frequency as the "escape attempt" frequency. The penny
is rattling around in its little gravity well with frequency F (x
T)
and has a certain probability to escape at each attempt--a probability
we will estimate in the next section. Meanwhile the relevant parameters
calculated for this "hot copper oscillator" at room temperature (T =
300 degrees Kelvin) are:
E(xT)
= kT = 4.8 x 10-14 ergs
F(xT)
= 11 kHz = FA
xT
= 5 x 10-7
We see that
due to thermal agitation the penny is vibrating at a frequency of about
10, 000 cycles per second and the amplitude of this vibration is 5 ten
millionth of the critical tilt angle S/R. We take this frequency to be
the escape attempt frequency and now calculate the thermal and quantum
probabilities for a successful attempt. And hence the estimated
lifetime for a penny standing on its edge.
PROBABILITIES FOR A
SUCCESSFUL ESCAPE
THERMAL HOPPING
The probability P
T
that the penny with energy kT will surmount an energy barrier of height
NkT is just:
P
T
= exp (-N)
where N is the number of
what might be
called "thermal quanta" needed to surmount the barrier. If this number
N is small, the probability of thermal hopping is high. If N
is a
large number, the probability of hopping is exponentially small. In the
case of the upright US penny, the energy barrier E(max) is 3.4 ergs.
Expressing this energy in "thermal quanta" we obtain:
E(max) = NkT
N = 7.1 x 10
13
P
T = exp (-7.1 x 10
13)
Multiplying this
probability by the attempt frequency F (x
T), and
transforming from natural exponentials to powers of ten, we obtain the
penny's thermal hopping frequency F
T:
FT
= 1.1 x 10-3.1 x10 to the 13th power sec-1
which is the inverse of the thermal escape lifetime T
T
--how long the penny will resist being pushed over by its
internal thermal oscillations:
| TT
= 0.9 x 103.1 x10 to the 13th power
secs |
This estimated lifetime is
an
inconceivably large number, not only stretching the powers of our
imagination but also pushing the limits of decent mathematical
notation. The lifetime of this upright penny against the force of
thermal agitation is not merely a number with 13 zeros after it but a
number with 1013 zeros after it! In practical
terms this
number is an extremely good approximation for "forever".
Balanced
on its edge, perturbed only by thermal agitation, the penny will never
fall.
QUANTUM TUNNELING
So thermal
agitation will never succeed in freeing the penny from its gravity
well, but perhaps quantum mechanics can come to the rescue. The quantum
probability for tunneling thru a barrier is related to the dimensions
of the barrier as measured in units of "action" where action (momentum
x distance) is
expressed in units of Planck's constant. If the barrier consists of a
small number of action units, the probability for tunneling will be
large. If the barrier consists of a large number of action units the
tunneling probability is exponentially small. Because the US penny is a
macroscopic object we might reasonably expect that the number of action
units that describe the gravity barrier is large. The only question
then is: how large? How close to "forever" is the penny's quantum
lifetime T
Q?
The probability for quantum tunneling
depends both on the height H and
width W of the barrier and on the barrier's shape. For a
rectangular barrier, the shape factor G = 2. For a triangular barrier,
G = 4/3. For a parabolic barrier, G = pi/2. The penny's gravity well is
an example of a parabolic barrier so G = pi/2.
P
Q
= exp-G(HW)/h
where the product HW has
the dimensions of action and can be expressed as a multiple M of
Planck's constant of action h:
HW = Mh
Analogous to the thermal
hopping
probability which depends on the number of "thermal quanta" N needed to
surmount the barrier, quantum tunneling depends on the number of
"action quanta" M of which the barrier is composed. Expressed in terms
of the number M of action quanta composing the barrier, the quantum
tunneling probability is:
P
Q
= exp-GM
For a quantum particle in a
box ("hampered displacement") the quantity
of action that composes the barrier consists of the product of a
momentum term times the barrier width in centimeters. For quantum
"hampered
rotation" (the case of the penny) the quantity of action is the product
of an angular momentum term times the barrier width in radians. For the
penny the barrier action HW is given by:
HW = SQRT[2J(E(max) -
E(min)] x 2(S/R)
Setting E(min) = kT and
expressing this
barrier's strength in units of Planck's constant h, we arrive at the
number of "action quanta" M constituting the penny's confining
gravity well:
M = HW/h = 1.1 x 10
26
We can now calculate the
tunneling frequency F
Q and its inverse T
Q
the tunneling lifetime:
FQ
= FAPQ = FAexp-GM
= 1.1 x 10-4.7 x 10 to the 25th power seconds-1
| TQ
= 1/FQ = 0.9 x 104.7 x 10 to the 25th
power seconds |
We calculated the thermal hopping lifetime to be immensely long,
essentially "forever" but the quantum tunneling lifetime T
Q
is an even longer kind of "forever"--not a number with 25 zeros after
it but a number with 10
25 zeros after it!
To compare
this penny decay "forever" with ordinary eras, aeons and millenia, a
year is composed of
pi x
10
7 secs, the universe is supposed to be 14.5
billion years old (5 x 10
17 secs) and the
measured lifetime of the proton is greater than 10
34
sec (a 1 with 34 zeros after it)--each an infinitesimal instant
compared to an upright penny's quantum lifetime!
When you stand
a penny on edge there is a small chance that it will quantum-tunnel its
way out of its gravity well. But this calculation gives new meaning to
the term "small chance" and illustrates just how irrelevant quantum
effects are to ordinary-sized objects. Quantum mechanics completely
dominates the behavior of electrons, photons, atoms and molecules. As
our technology improves we have been able to prepare and measure larger
and
larger systems whose behavior is non-classical, systems such as beakers
of superfluid helium, room-sized superconducting niobium magnets,
billions of
rubidium atoms forming a Bose-Einstein Condensate, and bright
non-classical
beams of light.
Some claim
that quantum mechanics is fundamentally involved in every conscious
experience (2) and that this intrinsic quantumness of their minds may
allow conscious beings to perform what would
be regarded in a classical world as miracles. One possibility put forth
is that consciousness might be able to hasten or retard radioactive
decay which is governed by quantum laws similar to those we have
invoked here to study the "decay of a penny". Conscious control of
nuclear decay, for example, would allow us to clean up nuclear waste by
controlled
burning and could turn nuclear weapons stockpiles into liabilities if
the lifetimes of their radioactive plutonium cores could be shortened
by focused conscious intent.
For developing
our "psychic muscles", it is probably best to start small. What is the
tiniest, what is "the most quantum", what is that system in
the world most
sensitive to psychic influence? What is the ultimate PK toy? Is it the
uninhibited neural synapse, one particular radioactive nucleus, some
special enzymatic chemical reaction we might influence by "prayer"? The
above
calculation shows that even an object as small as a US penny standing
on edge is "not quantum enough" to serve as an easy training weight for
a tentative psychic muscle gym.
On the other
hand, if someone could learn how to knock over pennies with
their mind and it had something to do with quantum mechanics, this
calculation would serve to quantify the
"miraculousness" of such an feat.
NICK HERBERT
Boulder Creek, CA
quanta@cruzio.com
Dec 15, 2006
(1) Milan Batista & Joze Paternelj "Quantum Cards &
Quantum Rods"
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0611036
(2) See, for example, Nick Herbert "Elemental Mind" Dutton (1993)